Anthropic just opened a new office in South Korea, joining its growing list of international locations as part of a broader Asia-Pacific expansion. On the surface, this seems like standard corporate news—big AI company opens regional office, files regulatory paperwork, hires local team. Business as usual.

Except it's not.

When a major AI provider goes multi-continental, it's not just about their growth story. It's about yours. Because the moment your AI vendor spans multiple regions, a new set of questions lands on your desk that didn't exist six months ago.

What Just Happened

Anthropic, the company behind Claude (the AI assistant you might be using right now), is establishing a physical presence in Seoul. This follows similar moves by OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft, all racing to plant flags across Asia-Pacific. South Korea is a strategic choice—it's home to Samsung, SK Hynix, and a robust tech ecosystem that's already heavily invested in AI development.

The official line is about "better serving customers in the region" and "partnering with local enterprises." That's true, but incomplete.

Why This Actually Matters to Your Business

Here's what most companies miss when they read these announcements: when your AI vendor goes global, your operational reality changes.

Latency becomes geography. If you're running AI-powered customer service in Australia, and your vendor's infrastructure is primarily US-based, you're dealing with response delays that compound across thousands of interactions. A regional office often means regional data centers, which means faster processing. That half-second improvement might be the difference between a customer completing a transaction or abandoning it.

Regulation gets complicated. South Korea has its own data protection laws. Australia has the Privacy Act. The EU has GDPR. When your AI provider operates across these jurisdictions, you inherit their compliance complexity. If you're a business owner in Melbourne using an AI tool that processes data through servers in Seoul, which rules apply? Both? The stricter of the two? This isn't theoretical—regulators are actively figuring this out, and you're caught in the middle.

Support isn't just a time zone issue. When something breaks at 3 AM your time, having a vendor with regional teams means someone is actually awake to fix it. But it also means you need to know: which team handles what? If you're troubleshooting an integration issue, are you dealing with the Sydney team or getting escalated to San Francisco? The organizational chart of your vendor suddenly matters.

The Bigger Pattern

Anthropic isn't unique here. This is the playbook: establish technical leadership in one market, then expand globally to compete with the giants. OpenAI is doing it. Google already has it. Microsoft's been there for decades.

What's new is the speed. Five years ago, enterprise software companies took years to build international presence. AI companies are doing it in months. The technology moves fast, the competitive pressure is intense, and the customer demand is global from day one.

For business owners, this creates an odd paradox: you get access to cutting-edge AI tools faster than ever, but the vendors themselves are still figuring out how to operate at this scale. You're not buying mature, stable infrastructure—you're buying into a company that's building the plane while flying it.

What You Should Actually Do

If you're currently using or evaluating AI tools from any major provider, here are the questions worth asking:

Where does my data actually live? Not where the company is headquartered—where do the servers process your requests? If you're subject to data residency requirements, this matters legally. If you're optimizing for performance, it matters operationally.

What's the support model across regions? Get specific. If you have an issue at 2 AM on a Sunday, what happens? Is there a local team, or does everything route through one global support queue?

How do they handle regulatory differences? If they operate in multiple countries, how do they ensure compliance with conflicting requirements? Do they even know? Some vendors have thought this through carefully. Others are winging it.

What's their data sovereignty policy? Can you specify that your data never leaves a particular region? Some providers allow this. Others don't. If you're in a regulated industry or working with government contracts, this could be a dealbreaker.

Think Global, Ask Local

Anthropic opening a Seoul office is not just a milestone for Anthropic. It's a signal that the AI industry is moving from "startup with a chatbot" to "global infrastructure provider." That shift changes the game for everyone using these tools.

Your AI vendor's geographic footprint is now part of your tech stack assessment. It affects performance, compliance, support, and risk. Companies that treat this as a footnote in the vendor evaluation will find themselves dealing with latency issues, compliance gaps, or support nightmares six months down the line.

The businesses that get this right will ask the boring questions early: Where are the servers? Who's on call? What regulations apply? It's not glamorous, but it's the difference between AI that scales smoothly and AI that becomes a compliance headache you can't easily escape.

Anthropic's expansion is great news for them. Whether it's great news for you depends entirely on whether you're asking the right questions before you commit.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Trying to figure out where AI fits in your business, or whether your current AI strategy is actually working? That's exactly what we do at Cue Crafted. We help small and mid-sized businesses cut through the hype and build AI strategies that deliver real value, not just expensive experiments. Schedule an intro today.